The Yahnke Tapes: Harmful “Reparative Therapy” Advocated.
A post by Neil Hart on homosexuality, LGBT lesbian and gay stuff and the Lutheran Church of Australia
The LCA College of Presidents sanctioned a seminar on sexuality which was held in the Mannum Lutheran Church, South Australia in August this year. The Seminar entitled “Clear Conscience, Courageous Living” was conducted by the directors of “Doxology”, a recognised service organisation of the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod. One of those directors is Beverly Yahnke a registered Clinical Psychologist who also serves as Professor of Psychology at The Lutheran Concordia University in Wisconsin.
Dr Yahnke conducted the first 2 sessions of the seminar which focused on homosexuality. It is disturbing that a person with attitudes such as those expressed in these 2 sessions is not only allowed to counsel young people who are gay or gender questioning but lectures undergraduate psychology students.
The full videos of all the sessions can be viewed here
My previous posts describe her use of a fabricated statement purporting to be the wording on a Californian Senate Bill to spread anti-gay community fear , her assertion that homosexuality should be considered a mental illness and unfortunate comments about societies that kill homosexuals.
Here is the next instalment.
Recently the California Governor signed into law a bill preventing the use of so-called “reparative therapies” on minors. The bill seeks to address the damage that is done to vulnerable young gay people who are brought to fundamentalist religious based counselling organisations by well meaning parents to change their sexual orientation, to get them “fixed”. There are already moves to present similar legislation in other US states.
When I first started looking into the whole “ex-gay”, ” pray- away- the- gay”, “Reparative Therapy” ,”Change is Possible”, snake- oil- sales routine it didn’t take long before I came across these Youtube clips. One time proponents of these ideas (including some foundation members of Exodus international) apologised for the harm and even suicides they had caused over the years.
It was disappointing, but not really surprising, to find that the LCA’s visiting expert on homosexuality advocated just such a harmful practices. Allow me to throw a little additional light on the Dr Yahnke’s presentation.
Dr Yahnke indicates that there are varieties of research in her handouts from “radical Christian reactionary groups” to “completely scientific groups”. She champions the research done Yarhouse and Jones as a “land mark study… scientifically exquisitely rigourous”.
But, dear reader, we HAVE learnt by now not to take things on face value…havent we?
Firstly, neither Yarhouse nor Jones can be described as unbiased scientists without an agenda of their own.
Stanton Jones is Professor of Psychology at Wheaton College, a conservative Evangelical Christian institution. It is reported that as provost of the College he led a purge allowing only those scientists to stay at the college who did not endorse human evolution. The same report indicates that his belief that the Bible unambiguously condemns monogamous same-sex relationships also helps to shape his employment policy.
Mark Yarhouse was mentored by Jones at Wheaton college when he studied Theology and Psychology. He is now a professor at Regent University. Originally called the Christian Broadcasting Network University, Regent University was founded by Tele evangelist Pat Robertson. Their Motto is “Christian leadership to change the world.”
I’m not saying that conservative Christians operating in conservative Christian institutions cannot produce rigorous scientific research but with an issue as theologically biased as homosexuality Jones and Yarhouse’s pedigree is surely worth noting.
Secondly, while Dr Yahnkle is positively gushing about Yarhouse and Jones’ exquisite science she is somewhat less enamoured with the work of Exodus International. She describes them as a
“militant Christian group who almost move to a process of brain washing an individual to move from homosexuality back (?) to heterosexuality.
There is just one problem. Yarhouse and Jones’ “scientifically exquisite” study was actually commissioned by the “militant brainwashing” Exodus International .
(In the immortal words of Texas Governor Rick Perry after a monumental gaff which eliminated him from the 2012 presidential race….”Oops!”)
The initial findings of the study were released as a book in 2007. The release was timed to coincide with the Christian Counsellors World Conference. When Alan Chambers, the president of Exodus announced the release of the book at that conference, he said…
“Finally, there is now scientific evidence to prove what we as former homosexuals have known all along – that those who struggle with unwanted same-sex attraction can experience freedom from it.”
There is the point.
“Freedom from homosexuality”…”FORMER homosexuals” or, as the Exodus banners boldly claimed at their annual conferences for the last few decades…
“Change Is Possible”.
The only problem is… as much as the conservative Christian lobby would like it to be otherwise… it just isn’t true.
The study itself seems to say as much. One review of the study summarised it like this
Out of 98 highly motivated subjects, the authors found that a small, unspecified number (less than 6) can use prayer and counseling to shut down their sexual feelings or become a bit more bi. And possibly none who turned straight.
A more detailed critique of the study can be read here
Even Alan Chambers and Exodus International have had a change of heart and direction. Early this year Chambers, apparently tired of keeping up the pretence of being a “former homosexual” said the following in a panel discussion at a 2012 Gay Christian Network Conference.
The majority of people that I have met, and I would say the majority meaning 99.9% of them, have not experienced a change in their orientation.
Since then Exodus have removed all books recommending “reparative therapy” from their website and all links to NARTH the major organisation which advocates such practices.
But the real issue here is not whether a gay person can become a little bit more bi or not. The real issue is the harm that is done to young, vulnerable, confused gay christians who are subjected to “reparative therapies”. Dr Yahnke chooses to read out and bold print in her notes the following sentence…
Evidence from the study suggested that change of sexual orientation appears possible for some and that Psychological distress did not increase on average as a result of (people’s) involvement in the change process.
That Dr Yahnke chose to focus on this one questionable study betrays her own prejudice. She could rather have focused on the statements and studies of (in alphabetical order)…
American Academy of Pediatrics
American Association of marriage and Family Therapy
American Counseling Association.
American Medical Association
American Psychiatric Association
American Psychoanalytic Association
American School Counselors association
National Association of Social Workers
All of these groups are critical of and do not recommend or endorse any form of “reparative therapies”
The wording of the Californian Act banning the use of these therapies on minors also gives a long list of the research outlining the very real dangers posed by such therapies. It states…
|
When Dr Yahnke advocates the possibility of a change in sexual orientation and denies the real harm that is caused by such attempts one wonders who she is speaking for, who she is defending. When the authorities of the LCA invite Dr Yahnke to speak on this subject and continue to promote the videos of her anti-gay lectures who are they speaking for. Whose good are they seeking? Neither Dr Yahnke nor the LCA are speaking for, defending or seeking the good of the LGBT people in their care. All reputable health care professionals have made that clear.
The only thing they seem to be defending is one particularly narrow interpretation of scripture and it looks like they are determined to defend it regardless of the human cost.
The sad thing is that this is not about actual evidence, it is not about actually wanting to know the truth, it is about justifying their own prejudices. Thus, any spurious evidence will do as long as it will allow them to continue their message of hate. I sometimes wonder what scripture these people follow, fo Christ did not say “hate one another”.
I’m sure many abusive parents justify what they do by calling it tough love. I’m sure they even use the Bible to do it.
From the California bill…
“The task force concluded that sexual orientation change efforts can pose critical health risks to lesbian, gay, and bisexual people, including confusion, depression, guilt, helplessness, hopelessness, shame, social withdrawal, suicidality, substance abuse, stress, disappointment, self-blame, decreased self-esteem and authenticity to others, increased self-hatred, hostility and blame toward parents, feelings of anger and betrayal, loss of friends and potential romantic partners, problems in sexual and emotional intimacy, sexual dysfunction, high-risk sexual behaviors, a feeling of being dehumanized and untrue to self, a loss of faith, and a sense of having wasted time and resources.”
Hmmm… Not potentially harmful???
Thanks for this. I meant to put a section in the post from the report but got worried about the length. But you’ve chgnaged my mind. Ill put this bit in.
Definition of REPARATIVE. : of, relating to, or effecting repair
Am I broken? Do I need to be repaired??
Jesus loves me, this I know!
Oddly enough, I heard good news of Wheaton College this morning. http://lattertimesnews.wordpress.com/2012/10/31/wheaton-college-down-the-drain/
The writer does not think it good news, but even in the most reactionary and ridiculous enclaves, people begin to speak the truth. Praise God!
reactionary and ridiculous… yup… that about sums up the lattertimesnews as well.
Here they are, speaking for themselves. The lights are going on: http://www.onewheaton.com/letter.html
What a great letter. and look at the list of names!
Neil, Neil, Neil, you are talking with human wisdom, with a humanistic viewpoint. I have been reading a few sermons lately and have discovered the beginnings of your slippery slope. According to Bob Jones Snr. all the problems we see today are because we have lost faith in an authoritative Bible. Where the bible speaks clearly we are to obey, so I suggest you listen to him!
“I want you folks to listen-you white and you colored folks. Do not let these Satanic progagandists fool you. This agitation is not of God. It is of the devil. Do not let people slander God Almighty. (I wonder how many people today would consider the civil rights movement Satanic?)
Let me repeat that it is no accident that most of the Chinese live in China. It is not an accident that most Japanese live in Japan; and the Africans should have been left in Africa, and the Gospel should have been taken to them as God commanded His people to do.”
Preaching from Acts he shows clearly that racial segregation is a God ordained order. Now don’t call him a racist, he says that the Chinese are wonderful people, some of his best friends are Chinese. You see he loves the people but hates the sin. Africans, Japanese, Chinese….great people…as long as they stay where they belong!
See what’s happened, those damned humanists and civil rights people have stuffed it for all of us….and you Neil are making it worse!
Ps. I’m not racist either, some of my friends are from Asia.
Ahhh… Bob Jones. Another genius who felt the need to form a university. (But, no false modesty here… ol’ Bob named it after himself.)
I don’t have ANY friends who are asians!
Just a footnote (not sure of my information so I’ve called it a footnote) I think it wasn’t until 1989 until the University apologized for the opinion and a staggering year 2000 when they admitted having attitudes that excluded certain races. My guess is that once the rest of society comes to its senses the Christian church will lag behind for about twenty years or so and then have to make some embarrassing apologies.
I’m not sure about that. The church took 400 years to apologise for declaring Galileo a heretic. The previous Pope di it in 2000 although the present Pope still thinks that the church was “just” in their condemnation of Galileo’s science because of the “ethical and social consequences of his teaching”…. (What the??????????)
Seems to me that the church lags behind sometimes by centuries and then without apology just quietly assumes the new identity.
Once the government withdraws funding from any organization that discriminates according to sexuality – I am sure they will start to listen and it won’t take twenty years.
Yes. The dollar will rule.
what woul happen if we believed more in a loving God and less in an inerrant bible?
Hmmm…now theres a discussion point.
Pingback: The Yahnke Tapes and Losing our Lutheran: Sin is Sin. « Lutheran Church of Australia: In my opinion.
Thanks for a great job in research and analysis Neil. You will either be canonized or burnt.
I have been thinking about Yahnke’s problem – her starting point – she begins with her personal discomfort with alternative sexualities – her put down jokes. This reflects the historical discomfort of our culture and the traditional scriptural justification for her feelings.
So she begins with a judgement – alternative sexualities are unnatural, not intended by God, mysterious, a distortion. There is no “cure” but any LGBT attraction is an addiction like addictions to gambling, alcohol, stealing or pornography. Don’t do it.
This gets her into law, judgements and condemnation – sin talk.
And then she tries to get into Gospel talk of mercy, compassion love the sinner – because this is what Christians do and she and the LCA are Christian.
And she fails because she thinks that compassion is made real by the intention of the giver. Wrong ! Compassion is made genuine and real not by the giver but by the way it is received.
The critical starting point which is not in her presentation is EMPATHY, walking in the footsteps of another with a deep intention to experience and understand them on their terms.
It’s what Jesus was all about in absolute terms – theology calls it INCARNATION. He didn’t just walk in the footsteps of a leper or a prostitute or a Samaritan or a bleeding woman or a LGBT – he was each one of them .
She talked about COM-PASSION. The word means “suffering with”. And without empathy there can be no compassion.
Her attitude and words are heard and experiences as phony, patronising, a grudging attempt to do what she is supposed to do because she is a Christian.
The challenge is to help the LCA to recognise that empathy is a critical item for interpreting Scripture so that the other Lutheran Solas become real – Christ, Grace and faith alone.
Geoff Burger
Burning still sounds decidedly unpleasant.
##It’s what Jesus was all about in absolute terms – theology calls it INCARNATION. He didn’t just walk in the footsteps of a leper or a prostitute or a Samaritan or a bleeding woman or a LGBT – he was each one of them .
She talked about COM-PASSION. The word means “suffering with”. And without empathy there can be no compassion.###
Yes, yes and YES! (but no to the burning)
Pingback: The Threat of Deletion | tapfotoreflections
Pingback: Exodus International Shuts Down. Colbert Responds. | Lutheran Church of Australia: In my opinion.